pmccartney:

amclennonblog:

peeperland:

’ mclennon is the most tragic love story in history ’ uhm. fucking excuse you. here i’ll tell you the story of mclennon, and why there are greater and stronger relationships than what was mclennon. or should i say, romantic relationships that actually exist(ed) in some way, shape, or form. this is a picture of romeo and juliet. they were a work of william shakespeare; one of the greatest writers in writing history. romeo and juliet tells of the tale of two lovers who never fully get to live their life together. they must rebel from their parents, who didn’t approve of them ever being together; an ill-fated love. their end was tragic. this is a picture of bonnie and clyde. the two were criminals. they killed anyone who dared to cross them and their business. their story is tragic, not at all beautiful. the two died together. mclennon my friends, has never been on the level of tragic. john lennon and paul mccartney were musicians apart of the most popular band of the 60s, to now. their musician partnership was ‘lennon and mccartney’, a competitive title. the two had battes and fights ensue, creative issues or personal problems with each other. they seperated and went their own ways. paul mccartney would live in exile in scotland, devastated that the band was no more. john would happily leave to live his life with yoko ono. the couple would later attend primal scream therapy in 1970. their friendship was really tarnished. i don’t see inner feelings for each other when they wrote two songs that were direct insults to the other. paul wrote too many people and john wrote how do you sleep (maybe the one more honest than the other). THEY WERE NOT FRIENDLY TO EACH OTHER ANYMORE. no made up internalized feelings that many mclennon shippers want to push and convince us to believe. they were barely connected, if connected at all. their meeting together in 1975 would be their last and there was small talk between them; only exchanging small talk to each other through telephone. i can admit, they were friends. what’s wrong with being simply just friends? friends go through great tragedies; like when john had passed. it was devastating, i’m absolutely sure of that. it was a tragic death. compared to romeo and juliet or bonnie and clyde, the relationship of john lennon and paul mccartney does not fall even close to being a tragic love story. how goddamn ignorant is that to say. why can’t friends be friends? what makes their so called ‘love story’ so tragic?? please let me know, because i personally don’t see it.

Originally posted by vodkaaprincesss

i dont usually add captions like this but what the hell

sorry dear - but i think you have no idea what you’re on about and i think people are allowed to think whatever way they would like to think. i think we shouldn’t be arguing about trivial matters like this, by trivial i mean - you don’t actually know what was really happening and therefore can’t really structure much around it. i love all of you guys and it’s breaking my heart to see this amount of conflict between views on stuff that no one here has a clue about. wouldn’t you want to subscribe to a more saner way of going about things? TL;DR? - It’s none of your beeswax.  But you can believe what you want.